Super-bust: Conjuration

We were right on the money yesterday here at Matt-That.com, with our prediction about the US stock market. As we expected, after washing out a false rally, the market turned downward. Howsoever, the sellers came out, presenting the kind of volume, that suggests we’re only closer to the second part of my prediction: that the market goes unfeelingly sideways.

In today’s session, traders and investors alike, from all around the world, will be forced to learn about a new mechanic taking shape in this market: Conjuration, I call it. Its certainly existed before, but not nearly as it does today.  Conjuration is the first step in creating pump and dump bear traps.

How do you create a Bear trap?  First, you conjure value out of thin air by suggesting if you miss a particular buying opportunity, you will get no other. This conjuration of value creates the same panic used during selling to initiate worry about being left out of the market, causing panic buying.

Today, we will conjure such value, in the form of a rally of immense proportions, with almost no basis in reality. This will form the upside dressing of the next stairstep down, continuing the wash-out of millions of new investors/positions. Soon, this exact ebb and flow will drive the market sideways.  The disinterest will be more profound when there is no dumb money to dump your shares on, nor trade volume to pump them up.

Many people have been taking advantage of the traders nature of this market — full of ups and downs. So, in order to remain safe, how can we time the beginning of this rather troubling event, of a side-ways market, to avoid holding positions on either side?

Monitoring the pessimism, using its reversals, we see its strength has grown to the downside, not diminished. So, we can begin to sell our short positions here (the most leveraged first). And we should not look to acquire many more leveraged positions going forward.  Leverage on any direction is the most dangerous position to be in, in a sideways market.  Logically though, what indicates the coming sideways market?

We’ve had sellers from 14,000 to now 7900.  And sellers came back into this market to take us to those levels. There can be only so much more selling pressure on the sidelines as we go.   But, what about the positive story then?  If we’re out of sellers we must be full of buyers, no? First rally almost 1000 points.  Second rally half, at just 550 points. Third rally, half again, some 250 points.  Strange, we’re running out of buyers too.  And that, is how you end up with a sideways market.

At points of maximum pessimism and optimism there must be cyclical reversals, otherwise a market has no psychological basis with which to use as function for pricing.  Todays cycle suggest the kind of rip-your-face-off rally we saw the first time.  And, like the first time, it will not hold.

Mortgage Market Prediction

Today’s S3 Crash is Tommorow’s Gloom 1.0, & Later, the Birth of the Grid

One day, all our computational abilities will flow, as electricity does, into every home, carrying with it the full force of the entire orchestra of functionality on the Internet — it will cease to be the Internet and become the Grid.

A prediction inspired by this...

Read the rest of this entry »

Four Magic Words

All over the world people are asking four magic words: Is this the bottom? The answer from analysts even going back to January 2007 say certainly not — back then predictions suggested 50-60% loss from around a 14,000 DIJA. We’re about half way there despite all the Fed’s recent efforts (with intra-day lows of 11,756.60). If you look closer and pick a giant like Google, there were analysts who predicted it would be at $850 at this time. GOOG trades instead at almost exactly a 50-60% markdown with lows of 412.11.

Read the rest of this entry »

Super-bust

It was Marcus Aurelius who said “Each thing is of like form from everlasting and comes round again in its cycle.” Looking toward our future in this age of industrial and technological super-boom, maybe whats looming just ahead, is the justice of a balance only nature must keep. In other words, the eventual, equally unrelenting… Super-bust. Its a topic I’ll continue to discuss from a variety of perspectives going forward. The content shown below is mostly reiterated from here, it describes how something just like this can happen, only with our financial structure.

Financial speculator and billionaire, George Soros states in his FT.com commentary: “the current crisis is the9360_a.png culmination of a super-boom that has lasted for more than 60 years.” In June’s Higher Rates Reflect Default Risk we described the end of the last credit boom: “In 1928, the U.S. Treasury Bond similarly broke out of the channel and rose to a higher yield. This coincided with the end of ‘easy’ money which forced the deleveraging of the economy and concluded with the financial crisis of 1929-1932.” Compare the two Treasury Bond Yield charts below. In 2005-2006 higher bond rates “broke out of the channel” and inflicted damage on the housing market. This marked “the end of ‘easy’ money.” Similarly since 2006, there has also been a flight to quality.

George Soros explains what happens next: “if federal funds were lowered beyond a certain point, the dollar would come under renewed pressure and long-term9360_b.png bonds would actually go up in yield. Where that point is, is impossible to determine. When it is reached, the ability of the Fed to stimulate the economy comes to an end.” As we described last June, we expect 10 year Treasury Bonds to be sold for cash in the panic, just as occurred at the end of the last credit cycle. Billionaire investor Julian Robertson agrees. As he revealed to Fortune: “the biggest bet that Robertson has in his own portfolio at the moment” is “long the price of two-year Treasury and short the price of the ten-year Treasury.”

Take Out the Papers & the Trash

Trash

Google to World: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet

All the experts turn out when it comes to our good friends over at “Don’t Be Evil.” — I mean Google. Have you ever wondered why? It may be because they’ve been doing a lot this year. Or, it could be, because despite all they have done in the the last year, we ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

In as many months, the publicity surrounding Google’s big-business activities, in the area of search, media advertising, and telecommunications have given body to Google’s business moves; a body which previously held a much more ghostly form — one buried in the cloaking power of the NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement). Still though, this is a body we now see only as eyes slowly peering from under a line of shadow — The Don’t Be Evil People, alright.

Lo, did I say telecommunications and Google in the same sentence? Sorry, Eric, I don’t mean to give away any major GooglePlans(tm) before they’re done being hatched… oh, and neither do you it seems.

Google has publicly denied plans to get into the lucrative business, valued at US$1.3-trillion globally, but industry experts say it is inevitable. The Mountain View, Calif.-based company already has its toes in it with offerings such as Google Talk and the hugely popular YouTube video service. A major splash is only a matter of time, and when Google — with its mammoth US$163-billion market capitalization — does dive in, phone company takeovers and Apple gizmos will look like quaint curiosities.

If Microsoft is the ever-apparent Goliath of the Information Technology Industry, than the world needs to stop right now and wonder, who is this David that we call Google with over 8 times the revenue per share? Way back, it seemed Google didn’t have any real reason to expand very far beyond search. The sudden domination of that area, gave them plenty of foot-room, and plenty of customers. In fact, domination over search for Google, because of the model they implemented, meant domination over advertising and brand building. These days, that model still sings. Free services and advertising sang something like a $10 billion dollar tune for the Don’t Be Evil People, and thats just in the last year.

You might say it seemed like Google had found a sufficient niche. Evolution though, leads to a new question: How to spend the windfall?

Google bought YouTube, of its many, many acquisitions, and made headlines. This purchase was quite shocking given the immense amounts changing hands. Still, besides the size of the sticker price, there are other reasons why the purchase shocked some experts. The internet-based video-medium employed by YouTube, in many ways just seeded in the minds of most internet users, could only be savored by pockets of enthusiasts. The bandwidth does not yet exist.

This meant a limit to the advertising audience and a limit to the visibility of Google’s brand as well as their clients. At least, thats how it seems when you’re dealing in billions.

A major factor; the ability of the general public to afford a source of high speed Internet access, in the form of emerging broadband, assisted greatly in YouTube’s adoption, or more generally the interim adoption of large file sharing in many formats — the kind that creates the demand for new network technology.

But, even now, within the flow of that demand, broadband Internet access is far from a universal given amongst Internet users. And, if we look purely in terms of the United States, while broadband penetration is considered high, the performance capacity of the penetrating networks themselves are extremely low (China’s transfer averages are around 100 times that of their US counterparts).

So, what could Google do? Seemingly it would appear a difficult market to enter. Or at least, one requiring time, money, strategy and/or perhaps innovation, to become competitive. It would seem unlikely of Google, or anyone for that matter, to be interested in spending the money to become competitive in such an arena. Doing that, would set a hard limit for growth within any company.

What if Internet TV doesn’t take off? (Not likely) What if Internet TV advertising doesn’t take off? No companies, or brands, big or small, will want to waste advertising dollars to have ads appear on your proprietary, side-show network — it makes them look only more small-time.

So, why go to all the trouble?

As it always is when looking down the long miles, it takes a bit of business longsight. If you’re Google, it is more than well worth your while to look far ahead. Lets put a name to our pain to help explain why we’re talking in such long time scales: custom… Telecommunications… Network…

This is what we need to build if we have Google’s “problem”. In short it means a lot of money up front. Building something as actual as a Telecommunications Network is very different from building software or an on-line service. But who knows how much fiber Google already has… What do the experts say?

TeleGeography’s Mr. Schoonover doubts Google will ever become a telephone company because the profit margins in businesses such as phone and broadband provision just aren’t worth it. But the company could save itself a ton in costs if it moves its web traffic off the networks owned by phone and cable firms and onto its own.

There is a hint here toward the end that explains why Google continues to build so many data centers, and just might be building the latest and greatest Internet backbone… saves itself a ton in costs if it moves its web traffic off of the networks owned by phone and cable firms and onto its own.

Now, you and me should be American about result number one, should Google build that network: Google can use those tons of savings to recuperate the building costs, over time — its just a form of deficit spending, and they are a company with a product: search. It is number two, on the other hand, that should stir perhaps a curiosity in anyone who has used a Google service: Google now owns the only proprietary network that runs the software everyone has been locked into using, only as a free segment of the Internet, for the better part of the last decade. Enter the private network segment: GoogleNet.

If Google moved all its traffic onto its own network, phone and cable firms would suddenly find the electronic equivalent of cobwebs and tumbleweeds blowing on their own networks. They would also find a gaping hole where big network usage revenue used to be and the roles could be reversed — the phone and cable firms could become customers of Google, selling access to its network.

This is now a great truth about the Internet — commercial networks would become increasingly unnecessary as they provide less sense of service, offering little more than bandwidth. Google means access to information services, content, cache, etc.

How much would you pay to be on? How much if you needed it to run your business?

As Google, you can now isolate your users and charge on any basis you like. You can create any deriving technology you like — you’re also the market leader in brand awareness and advertising. You can charge to peer with this network or just to make use of it temporarily. Also, you have isolated all your existing products and services onto this network. You can ensure security. You can ensure integrity. You can ensure availability. You can now choose how you plan to lease access to even your individual services finitely and with a greater sense of control and awareness.

Google may not want to be a phone company per se, Mr. Surtees says, but the old definition of what a phone company is no longer applies. Just as Google redefined search and advertising, so too is the company changing the definition of telecommunications. “Telecom is meshed and integral to what Google does and is becoming moreso,” he says. Mr. Enderle says Google won’t have to stretch its core business strategy — offering ad-based services for free to consumers - very far to offer telecommunications services. In fact, it’s exactly the business model the company is experimenting with in mobile phones.

Progressively, more Internet-based activities will rely on Google Services or results from some Google-based solution, as are so many already, irregardless of the network path taken to make use of them. This is why, in the end, Google will enter this arena of Telecommunications. For Google, shortening that path, securing the end-to-end communication through some retail Google device, say, means better, more reliable service, and a significant incentive to make that service come at price.

The NOT So Funny Future

Here are some predictions made in 1900, about life 100 years in the future. What do I predict for the near future? Thats easy: dark humor.

Prediction #2: The American will be taller by from one to two inches. His increase of stature will result from better health, due to vast reforms in medicine, sanitation, food and athletics. He will live fifty years instead of thirty-five as at present for he will reside in the suburbs. The city house will practically be no more. Building in blocks will be illegal. The trip from suburban home to office will require a few minutes only. A penny will pay the fare.

Yep, The American will be taller alright. And being American will come standard with: a bigger penis, larger bank account, faster car, cooler sunglasses, better drugs & sex, a mansion with a swimming pool, a hot wife, perfect kids, and high-level officials that make you feel like a genius. Horray!

Read the rest of this entry »