The Chrome Web

They are certainly all interesting– the reasons behind Google’s release of a new platform for web applications, that is. Its especially interesting the platform is admittedly disguised as browser project, one named for its user interface and explained with comic books — Chrome. Arguably, this is the sort of thing to set off whole shifts in Web development. And, the idea that Chrome runs on a Javascript engine written from scratch, called V8, changes the whole browser game– But before I lose it in technical ramblings, here are some of the reasons I think Google’s chroming the Web…

6) Google has long had interest in further advancing Javascript, as its a core technology for them.  This kind of advancement, further closes the gap created by the Web’s client-server design. It introduces an initial foundation for direct use of Google’s “cloud” more importantly.

5) Google employees must spend a large majority of their time in a browser because work is so closely tied to the Web — cutting out the middle-man will save future time and effort expenses. And Google is all about BIG simplicity.

4) Chrome better enables Google to produce metrics about Web use — in fact, one mandate of the Chrome development team is ensure Chrome will work best on popular sites. So, if you’re the paranoid type, make sure you enable Chrome’s Incognito mode.

3) Google has long been at war with Microsoft; Chrome might split browser market-share, reducing IE’s already straining grip due to Firefox growing popularity. This could help to diminish Microsoft on the Web.

2) Chrome’s innovative and will attract a community; users for its ease and feature rich landscape, developers for its obvious seamless integration with things like Google Gears and Google’s APIs (perhaps for its out-right sane behavior).

and the #1 reason) Why not play the Web from both sides before an effective way is developed to delever your 70+% hold on the Internet advertising market.

UPDATE 3:44PM EST – 

Here she is…  Chrome is fast.  It can’t login to Zimbra. But it obviously works with Wordpress just fine. 

Today’s S3 Crash is Tommorow’s Gloom 1.0, & Later, the Birth of the Grid

One day, all our computational abilities will flow, as electricity does, into every home, carrying with it the full force of the entire orchestra of functionality on the Internet — it will cease to be the Internet and become the Grid.

A prediction inspired by this...

Read the rest of this entry »

Wonder Twin Powers Activate: International Google Machines

Not since the likes of Zan & Jayna have twin powers activated as they have with the joint appearance of CEOs for IBM & Old Wonder TwinsGoogle at IBM’s PartnerWorld conference this year. As they put it in the Computer World article entitled Google and IBM are bonding in a serious way, “The two CEOs bantered like old golf buddies, praising each other’s organizations and rarely giving moderator Pankaj Ghemawat, a professor of globalNew Wonder Twins strategy at the IESE Business School in Barcelona, Spain, a chance to ask questions.” Schmidt said, “Cloud computing is the story of our lifetime.” Concluding, “Eventually all devices will be on the network.” Schmidt was joined onstage by IBM CEO Sam Palmisano, who said the relationship marks a new territory “It is the first time we have taken something from the consumer arena and applied it to the enterprise.” So, whats with the the oldest computer giant pairing with the latest? Maybe its just that the industry is growing up and its become something new.

Google: Shape of 600 lb. Search Gorilla

Google continues to take shape with things like updating its Finance site, giving Google Video a face lift, and Google: Form of 600lb. Gorilla!continued production of solutions helping others go green. While IBM, the hardware giant of the pair seems in step, this is possible largely because of the dancing space Google’s created; causing Microsoft and Yahoo to consider a merger, analog advertising to fall apart, cell phone networks to become open, and especially bringing a new advertising domain to the table in the form of its massive YouTube audience. These days, nothings too far from the reach of this 600 lb. Googrilla that grew up dominating the tech-world. Google-inspired engineering is especially apparent at IBM with services like Many Eyes and History Flow.

IBM: Form of Enterprise Cloud

The created space hasn’t gone to waste. In all of 2007, IBM reported sales of $98.8 billion, up 8 percent from 2006, IBM:Shape of of Enterprise Cloudleaving most sure of its stranglehold on enterprise service and hardware sales for the time being. The line is blurring between the two companies — Google and IBM — and its making these power twins much more identical these days. Even Google CEO Eric Schmidt had made some admissions to that point. “There’s not that much difference between the enterprise cloud and the consumer cloud,” Schmidt said. Later the CEO even offered a distinction which displays the two companies shared reasoning, “The cloud has higher value in business; that’s the secret to our collaboration,” Schmidt added.

The Greater Story: The Grid

The fact is, theres a greater story to be told. It has to due with all these players and a metamorphosis taking place in the industry. It started with the Internet and continues with the creation of the “Cloud” — a generic name for a platform for utility computing that hopes to eventually process, store and transfer every bit of information on Earth. Its a changeover whereas time passes and giants collide in sometimes peaceful ways as with Google and IBM, and sometimes violent ways as once forced together Microsoft gives up its bid for Yahoo. The metaphors of a Gorilla creating space invokes a more forceful saying as well: Lead, follow, or get out of the way. And as once before humanity saw the local energy provider take shape to become the power company, then become regional, and then global — from a network to a grid — so digital information processing, storage and transfer will go from the unit of the PC, to a network, to an Internet, to a Cloud, later becoming an equally, finely, more tightly bound and integrated Grid of utility computing devices (perhaps it’ll even run on International Google Machines).

Fish in the Sea

GoogleFish

Microsoft’s Document Standard

I haven’t given this thing (the OOXML Spec) much of my time on this blog, sorry. Its just that, the whole standard, including the spec, is one huge, smelly piece of crap. Sorry, as articulate as you may think me, those are the choice words of description for such a work of disaster and stupidity. But, rather then I spending my time (or wasting your time) explaining why OOXML is so crappy, to you each, my beloved readers, I’d rather simply show you the pictures and have you draw the conclusion. Below is… the simple… easy to use… Microsoft XML standard. I’ll let you borrow it for the weekend, so you can get up to speed.

OOXML Spec

Google to World: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet

All the experts turn out when it comes to our good friends over at “Don’t Be Evil.” — I mean Google. Have you ever wondered why? It may be because they’ve been doing a lot this year. Or, it could be, because despite all they have done in the the last year, we ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

In as many months, the publicity surrounding Google’s big-business activities, in the area of search, media advertising, and telecommunications have given body to Google’s business moves; a body which previously held a much more ghostly form — one buried in the cloaking power of the NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement). Still though, this is a body we now see only as eyes slowly peering from under a line of shadow — The Don’t Be Evil People, alright.

Lo, did I say telecommunications and Google in the same sentence? Sorry, Eric, I don’t mean to give away any major GooglePlans(tm) before they’re done being hatched… oh, and neither do you it seems.

Google has publicly denied plans to get into the lucrative business, valued at US$1.3-trillion globally, but industry experts say it is inevitable. The Mountain View, Calif.-based company already has its toes in it with offerings such as Google Talk and the hugely popular YouTube video service. A major splash is only a matter of time, and when Google — with its mammoth US$163-billion market capitalization — does dive in, phone company takeovers and Apple gizmos will look like quaint curiosities.

If Microsoft is the ever-apparent Goliath of the Information Technology Industry, than the world needs to stop right now and wonder, who is this David that we call Google with over 8 times the revenue per share? Way back, it seemed Google didn’t have any real reason to expand very far beyond search. The sudden domination of that area, gave them plenty of foot-room, and plenty of customers. In fact, domination over search for Google, because of the model they implemented, meant domination over advertising and brand building. These days, that model still sings. Free services and advertising sang something like a $10 billion dollar tune for the Don’t Be Evil People, and thats just in the last year.

You might say it seemed like Google had found a sufficient niche. Evolution though, leads to a new question: How to spend the windfall?

Google bought YouTube, of its many, many acquisitions, and made headlines. This purchase was quite shocking given the immense amounts changing hands. Still, besides the size of the sticker price, there are other reasons why the purchase shocked some experts. The internet-based video-medium employed by YouTube, in many ways just seeded in the minds of most internet users, could only be savored by pockets of enthusiasts. The bandwidth does not yet exist.

This meant a limit to the advertising audience and a limit to the visibility of Google’s brand as well as their clients. At least, thats how it seems when you’re dealing in billions.

A major factor; the ability of the general public to afford a source of high speed Internet access, in the form of emerging broadband, assisted greatly in YouTube’s adoption, or more generally the interim adoption of large file sharing in many formats — the kind that creates the demand for new network technology.

But, even now, within the flow of that demand, broadband Internet access is far from a universal given amongst Internet users. And, if we look purely in terms of the United States, while broadband penetration is considered high, the performance capacity of the penetrating networks themselves are extremely low (China’s transfer averages are around 100 times that of their US counterparts).

So, what could Google do? Seemingly it would appear a difficult market to enter. Or at least, one requiring time, money, strategy and/or perhaps innovation, to become competitive. It would seem unlikely of Google, or anyone for that matter, to be interested in spending the money to become competitive in such an arena. Doing that, would set a hard limit for growth within any company.

What if Internet TV doesn’t take off? (Not likely) What if Internet TV advertising doesn’t take off? No companies, or brands, big or small, will want to waste advertising dollars to have ads appear on your proprietary, side-show network — it makes them look only more small-time.

So, why go to all the trouble?

As it always is when looking down the long miles, it takes a bit of business longsight. If you’re Google, it is more than well worth your while to look far ahead. Lets put a name to our pain to help explain why we’re talking in such long time scales: custom… Telecommunications… Network…

This is what we need to build if we have Google’s “problem”. In short it means a lot of money up front. Building something as actual as a Telecommunications Network is very different from building software or an on-line service. But who knows how much fiber Google already has… What do the experts say?

TeleGeography’s Mr. Schoonover doubts Google will ever become a telephone company because the profit margins in businesses such as phone and broadband provision just aren’t worth it. But the company could save itself a ton in costs if it moves its web traffic off the networks owned by phone and cable firms and onto its own.

There is a hint here toward the end that explains why Google continues to build so many data centers, and just might be building the latest and greatest Internet backbone… saves itself a ton in costs if it moves its web traffic off of the networks owned by phone and cable firms and onto its own.

Now, you and me should be American about result number one, should Google build that network: Google can use those tons of savings to recuperate the building costs, over time — its just a form of deficit spending, and they are a company with a product: search. It is number two, on the other hand, that should stir perhaps a curiosity in anyone who has used a Google service: Google now owns the only proprietary network that runs the software everyone has been locked into using, only as a free segment of the Internet, for the better part of the last decade. Enter the private network segment: GoogleNet.

If Google moved all its traffic onto its own network, phone and cable firms would suddenly find the electronic equivalent of cobwebs and tumbleweeds blowing on their own networks. They would also find a gaping hole where big network usage revenue used to be and the roles could be reversed — the phone and cable firms could become customers of Google, selling access to its network.

This is now a great truth about the Internet — commercial networks would become increasingly unnecessary as they provide less sense of service, offering little more than bandwidth. Google means access to information services, content, cache, etc.

How much would you pay to be on? How much if you needed it to run your business?

As Google, you can now isolate your users and charge on any basis you like. You can create any deriving technology you like — you’re also the market leader in brand awareness and advertising. You can charge to peer with this network or just to make use of it temporarily. Also, you have isolated all your existing products and services onto this network. You can ensure security. You can ensure integrity. You can ensure availability. You can now choose how you plan to lease access to even your individual services finitely and with a greater sense of control and awareness.

Google may not want to be a phone company per se, Mr. Surtees says, but the old definition of what a phone company is no longer applies. Just as Google redefined search and advertising, so too is the company changing the definition of telecommunications. “Telecom is meshed and integral to what Google does and is becoming moreso,” he says. Mr. Enderle says Google won’t have to stretch its core business strategy — offering ad-based services for free to consumers - very far to offer telecommunications services. In fact, it’s exactly the business model the company is experimenting with in mobile phones.

Progressively, more Internet-based activities will rely on Google Services or results from some Google-based solution, as are so many already, irregardless of the network path taken to make use of them. This is why, in the end, Google will enter this arena of Telecommunications. For Google, shortening that path, securing the end-to-end communication through some retail Google device, say, means better, more reliable service, and a significant incentive to make that service come at price.

Microsoft Surface

Microsoft SurfaceIn a long awaited move (at least, long awaited by me), Microsoft announced the upcoming Winter 2007 release of the Surface product line. To give you an idea, the User Interface for Microsoft Surface products is not so different from the User Interface the main character uses in Minority Report to track crimes. You can get the gist at the Microsoft Surface Website.

Matt That is a Microsoft shareholder.